Monday, September 26, 2011

The Social Construction of Reality: Romanian Style (Chapter 3 Second Post)

“The social construction of reality itself is a massive political process.  All governments live or die by their ability to manipulate public opinion so they can reinforce their claims to legitimacy.  Information is selectively released, altered, or withheld in an attempt to gain public approval and support for their policies” (Newman, 2010, p. 62).
It is hard to imagine a government more involved in manipulating news in order to construct a reality for its citizens than Romania, during the dictatorship of Nicolae Ceausescu from 1061 until December 1989, just two months before I was born there. 
Nicolae Ceausescu was, in a way, my father.  He wasn’t my father in the biological sense, but during the later years of his dictatorship, he came to control nearly every aspect of Romanian people’s lives.  He controlled the food they ate.  He sold off most of the country’s meat and vegetables, and he put Romanians on a meager ration of substandard food that could not be sold abroad.  Ceausescu controlled the housing Romanians  could live in, bulldozing villages and private homes and moving people to huge, poorly constructed concrete block apartments in the cities, many without inside plumbing.  He controlled all transportation, rationing gasoline for the few who had private cars and severely limiting any other means of travel for those without cars.  Ceausescu controlled Romanians’ access to basic necessities like electricity and water. Electricity use was severely limited to just one 40 watt bulb per apartment, and in most buildings water was turned off entirely for most of the day, and could be used only for a few hours in the early morning and early evening. 
Nicolae Ceausescu even controlled people’s reproductive rights, which is why I say that, in a sense, he was my father.  Wanting to increase the population of Romania to produce a larger work force, Ceausescu outlawed birth control and abortion and instituted a policy requiring every woman to have at least five children.  I was conceived under this policy, the fourth child of very poor Romani peasants who had no means to take care of me.  Like my sister before me, I went straight from the maternity hospital to the orphanage.  My birth mother became a hero of the state, bearing at least seven children, five of whom were turned over to the state for their care. 
The list of ways Nicolae Ceausescu controlled the everyday reality of Romanians goes on and on. So how did this one man manage to control so completely nearly every aspect of Romanians’ lives?  For starters, nearly one out of every five Romanian adults was an informer or watcher, and order was kept by a ruthless and well-armed secret police called the Securitate.   But what really kept everyone in line was that Ceausescu controlled the news and nearly all forms of communication in Romania.  The only newspapers were controlled and produced by the state.  The only radio was controlled and produced by the state.  Telephones were in very limited supply, and calls were monitored by listeners.  International calls were impossible to make.  Travel into and outside of Romania was forbidden for nearly everyone except certain trusted high ranking Communist Party members on official government business.
But above all, Nicolae Ceausescu controlled Romanian television and used it to create his own version of “reality” for the Romanian people.  His rule has been described as a personality cult.  He had Romanian artists and photographers and sculptors create thousands of huge images of himself as Romania’s beloved leader.  Ceausescu’s likeness appeared in every square and on every corner so that Romanians were never far from a larger than life depiction of their brilliant leader.  Ceausescu had huge pageants produced starring thousands of Romanian singers, dancers, marchers, and performers, to celebrate himself and his amazing accomplishments.  These pageants were performed in giant stadiums and televised so that citizens across Romania could see, nearly every night during the couple of hours that the one and only state-run television channel was available to them, just how brilliant, kind, wise, and just plain wonderful their beloved leader was.  It was a construction of reality on a huge scale, and the message was always the same:  Everything is great in Romania, thanks to our beloved leader.
When severe drought and aggressive export policies led to severe food shortages and strict rationing of food for all Romanians, Ceausescu turned to television to create a different “reality” for Romanians.  With the television camera rolling, Ceausescu visited several dairy farms to show Romanians that milk was plentiful, even though it was never in the stores.  Romanian television viewers didn’t see, however, that the cows in the story were actually trucked from farm to farm for these reports, because most of Romania’s dairy farms had sick and skinny cows or none at all!  When Ceausescu visited the produce farms at harvest time for benefit of the Romanian television viewers, the images of the bountiful harvest were, in fact, created with the help of painted wooden props of apples, pears, tomatoes and the like, and green paint sprayed on the dead brown grasslands.  The message on Ceausescu TV was that food is plentiful in Romania, notwithstanding its absence from the store near you.  In fact, that was the message every night on Ceausescu TV:  Everything is great in Romania, thanks to the wise policies of your great leader.
In a twist of irony, it was Ceausescu’s state-controlled television that eventually brought him down and led to his summary execution in December, 1989 as the Iron Curtain of Communism fell all across Eastern Europe.  In Ceausescu’s case, the revolutionaries managed, early in their uprising, to gain physical control of the Romanian state television.  They used Ceausescu’s own television station to help secure the removal of Ceausescu and his cronies from power.  Romania’s short revolution culminated in the capture of Ceausescu and his wife Elena, their summary trial, lasting less than an hour, and their execution before a firing squad, all in a matter of a few days.  Someone videotaped the executions, and soon, the executions were being shown every day on Romanian television.  As Newman writes, “sometimes realities change almost instantaneously” (Newman, 2010, p. 53).  Yes they do.
 When my adoptive parents traveled to Romania in October, 1990, life was still pretty hard then as Romanians struggled to reinvent their government and to rebuild their newly free country after so many years of Communist rule.  The orphanages containing me and an estimated 300,000 other children were no longer secret, and people traveled to Romania from many countries to try to adopt us.  Pictures of the miserable conditions in these institutions were televised around the world.  I was one of the lucky ones who got out. 
My adoptive parents say that in October 1990, food was still in short supply and water and power were still rationed as Romanians worked to figure out their new reality.  But my parents also remember that there were already several television channels and many newspapers just a few months after the revolution. 
And on one of the new Romanian stations, the Ceausescu executions were still being shown every day!   

Work Cited:
Newman, D.M. (2010). Sociology:  Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life.  8th Ed.  Pine Forge Press: Thousand Oaks, California

If you are interested in learning more about Nicolae Ceausescu’s rule in Romania, I recommend the following:
Pacepa, Ion Michai. (1987) Red Horizons:  The True Story of Nicolae and Elena Ceausescus’ Crimes, Lifestyle, and Corruption. Regnery Gateway: Washington, D.C.
Klugman, Gail. (1998) The Politics of Duplicity:  Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania. The University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Assignment 3: My Personal Billboards

My personal billboards are on the light-hearted side.  I think that personal billboards that promote controversial causes like abortion rights, gun control, or political issues in general are best left off of cars.  I want to avoid inciting road rage as much as possible.  My personal billboards are designed to make people smile, because I think we need to do more of that.
The personal billboards shown above are ones I made up for this assignment, but the one that follows is the one I actually have.  Yes, I am an avid tennis player!  From having this license plate, however, I have learned that people sometimes drive too close to try to figure it out, and I think it does attract a little extra attention from the cops!


Monday, September 19, 2011

The Khan Academy: Where Has This Been All My Life? (Chapter 2 Second Post)

The video about Khan Academy in the “Supplemental Material” for Chapter One of our textbook is hands down my favorite things in this course so far.  I have already put the information there to my own personal use.
Since this is an on-line course, it seems especially fitting for us to watch a video about on-line learning.  To me, Khan is a genius who has taken on-line learning to a new level.  When I went on the website for Khan Academy (click here: http://www.khanacademy.org/) , I clicked on the green “Play a Video” box because I wanted to see for myself what Khan's lectures are like.  Since I am taking Evolution this semester, I decided to see if Khan had any videos that might help me out there.  Clicking on the “Play a Video” box was very enlightening.  When Khan says he has lots of videos, he is not kidding.  It is dazzling to think that he has personally done so many of them.  They are mostly in math and sciences, but there are also a few in business and some other areas.  I found videos on various Evolution topics under “Biology” and decided to watch the one on DNA to see if it would clear up my rather foggy understanding of this topic from reading my current textbook.  All I can say is, “Wow!” 
These videos are relatively low tech.  I guess I was expecting to see Mr. Khan himself writing on a white board.  Instead, you don’t see Mr. Khan.  You hear him.  What you see is a white board on which he writes, not too much but not too little, as he calmly explains the basics in a way you wish you had seen years ago, before the first biology chapter you ever encountered on this subject. The handwriting that appears is a bit messy, but legible, and it sems somehow to add to the charm of the lecture. I found the DNA lecture very easy to follow and more interesting than reading a textbook chapter that gave me way too much information for one sitting.  I think it would be great to watch a Khan video first, and then read the text. I haven’t had time yet (busy with some Blog assignments for another course!), but I plan to see what happens when I click on the “Practice with an Exercise” box for the subject of DNA.  I also watched the video entitled “Introduction to Evolution and Natural Selection” which had that same wonderful “clarifying” effect.  I was glad to see that the Khan Academy has several more videos available on Evolution topics.  I even won three badges, once I figure out how to log in and claim them, just as he promised!
I can really see how something like the Khan Academy could revolutionize the institution of education.  Khan's comment that his cousins prefer the digital version of him to the real guy when they are trying to learn something really rang true.  This technology makes it possible to repeat and relearn without embarrassment for either the student (for failing to learn) or the teacher (for failing to teach).  It will be interesting to see how long this idea takes to hit the mainstream of American education, if it ever does.  There will probably be numerous interest groups and organizations that feel threatened by it and may work against its acceptance and spread.  Yet on-line education in general represents a great potential for improving the results of our educational system and for extending educational opportunities to those who do not enjoy the luxury of face-to-face learning opportunities for any number of reasons.  Khan’s comments about the potential for globalization of education through this concept were also enlightening.  Globalization of education in general and one-on-one interaction between a student and a tutor across borders also seems like intriguing ideas for the 21st Century.   
The Khan Academy is an example of the rapidly changing face of education in light of new and evolving technologies.  In talking about our social institutions, our textbook says that “although the effects of changes can be felt at the organizational and institutional levels, they are ultimately initiated, implemented, or rejected, and, most important, experienced by individual people (Newman, 2010, p. 29).  Education is no exception.  Mr. Kahn has certainly been an individual agent of change in the social institution of education, and I, as an individual, have experienced the results of his efforts to change this institution myself by listening to his lectures.  The possibilities seem exciting and endless.
Side note:
Click here (http://www.startribune.com/opinion/otherviews/129995903.html) for an interesting reader editorial “Online education offers as much (if not more)" that appeared in the September 19, 2011 Minneapolis Star Tribune. This editorial is in counterpoint to a commentary entitled “On-line education doesn’t measure up” which appeared in the August 29 Minneapolis Star Tribune.
 Work Cited:
Newman, D.M. (2010). Sociology:  Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life.  8th Ed.  Pine Forge Press: Thousand Oaks, California.

Assignment 2: When I Was Twelve

My twelfth birthday was in 2002, and the social forces and historical events of that year had, and still have an undeniable and lasting effect on my life as it is today and as it will be for some time to come.   To illustrate this point, I’ll use my newly-discovered “sociological imagination” to explain how 2002 will probably always be with me.
I turned 12 not quite six months after the 9/11 terror attacks on the United States.  The year 2002 was largely dominated by the aftermath and response to those horrible events.  The 9/11 attacks instantly became the kind of life event that people experience and remember all their lives in a phenomenon psychologists call “flashbulb memories.”  A flashbulb memory remains exceptionally vivid for all of one’s life, is remembered with unusually accuracy.   Other examples are the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963 (my parent’s flashbulb memory) and the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1942 (my grandparents’ flashbulb memory).  But for my generation, the flashbulb memory is 9/11.  The events of 9/11 had lasting effects on my life beyond my ability to remember exactly when and where I first learned of the attacks and to recall so vividly the reactions of my parents, teachers and friends to these events as well as the endless coverage on television.  The 9/11 attacks also set in motion a powerful cascade of important political, economic, and social developments that were mostly outside of any one person’s control, and especially that of a 12-year-old girl. Many of these events occurred in 2002 and continue to shape my life today.  I will discuss a few of them here.
Wars and their Effects:  Although the invasion of Afghanistan by the United States and its allies to wipe out the al Qaida training camps and Taliban operations there began late in 2001, the year 2002 was dominated by these military efforts.   When the initial invasions occurred, the expectation was that these operations would be relatively quick and successful.  The belief was that Osama bin Laden was in Afghanistan and that the allied forces would quickly figure out where he was and kill or capture him.  No one seriously thought that this war would still be going on 10 years later or that it would take 10 years to deal with bin Laden.  Evidence of this was that on January 29, 2002, in his State of the Union Speech, U.S. President George W. Bush promised to expand the “war on terrorism” and designated Iran, Iraq and North Korea as the “Axis of Evil.” Presumably, at this point when the War in Afghanistan was just a month or two old, it was still the prevailing belief of the Bush Administration that this war would be over soon, and that the country should turn its attention to rooting out terrorist threats in those other three “evil” countries. 
The year 2002 was also characterized by the lead-up to the War in Iraq, especially in the last few months of 2002.  On September 12, 2002 President Bush addressed the United Nations and called for a “regime change” in Iraq (advocating the removal of Saddam Hussein).  In November of 2002, the United Nations passed a resolution saying that Iraq must cooperate with the United Nations inspections for weapons of mass destruction or else face serious consequences.  Iraq agreed to the U.N. resolution a few days later, and later that month, U.N. weapons inspectors arrived in Iraq to look for “WMD”.  None were found in 2002 or, for that matter, ever.  Yet the train had left the station leading up to a very costly War in Iraq, which is still going on today. 
The War in Afghanistan being fought in 2002 and the War in Iraq which started soon after that, have had enormous lasting political, social and economic effects on our lives.  It is hard to realize that the United States has been at war since before I even became a teenager.  Men and women who, like me, were in the sixth grade in 2002 have fought in those wars, been traumatized by them, been permanently injured by them, or have died in them.  I am so lucky none of those things happened to me or my loved ones, but we all owe a tremendous debt to those who serve.  My generation has not experienced what it is like to live in a country at peace since 2001 when we were children.  These wars and their effects largely define our lives today in many ways.  Those wars are a very big reason that the economy is so precarious todaym making it increasingly hard for my generation to find jobs when we graduate from college or graduate school or even to afford to live on our own instead of mooching off of our parents.  Consider that the unemployment rate in 2002 was 5.8%, compared to almost 10% today.  Stating an exact cost for these two wars is difficult because the Bush Administration did not include them in the federal budget for eight years.  They were instead financed sort of off the books, and borrowing for them did a lot to run up the trillions of dollars of federal deficit we hear so much about today, and that is dragging our country down.  The federal debt in 2002 was 6.228 billion, a number which probably sounded big then, but we would take it in a heartbeat today!
Protecting the Homeland from Me:  On November 25, the Homeland Security Act was signed into law.  It created the largest government agency in the U.S.  For all of 2002, air travel was characterized by greatly increased security measures following 9/11.  My brother was married in Philadelphia just two weeks after 9/11, and my parents and I were among the first Americans to fly on commercial airplanes following the attacks.  I remember the increased security, and feeling very nervous getting on the airplane.  I saw my parents and everyone else looking around the plane nervously, trying to see if anyone looked like someone who would hijack the plane and fly it into a building, and I was doing the same thing.  At that time, I think we were basically looking for people who looked like they might be from the Middle East.  Call it early racial profiling, I guess.   In the summer of 2002, I had surgery on my foot that involved placing a metal pin in my foot along the third metatarsal.  The recovery was eight weeks on crutches, which seemed forever.  My Mom decided to take me to Michigan to visit my grandmother, so we had to go through airport security in Minneapolis, wheelchair, crutches and all.  It was then that I learned that I look like someone from the Middle East. (I am actually a Roma from Romania.) I was subjected to extensive and invasive scrutiny, despite my age and obvious disability.  I had many thoughts about that pin in my foot that was ruining my summer, but hijacking an airplane was certainly not one of them!  I remember taking it very personally at the time.  Since then, I can't help but notice that I almost always seem to get selected for extra security when I fly anywhere.  I now understand that it is not personal.  It is just that I look like a member of a group that perpetrated the 9/11 attacks, and there is nothing I can do about it. 
More Terror Attacks,More Fear, and a New Approach to Foreign Travel:  Terror attacks were never far from people’s minds in 2002.  People were made uneasy by bomb attacks on a nightclub area in Bali on October 12, killing mostly foreign tourists and by sniper attacks in the Washington D.C. area beginning on October 2 and continuing for about three weeks.  The Bali bombs were indeed the work of al Qaeda, but the sniper attacks were found to have no connection to Muslim extremism beyond the religious background of one of the two snipers. Nonetheless, these terror attacks unnerved Americans everywhere.  My brother and his wife had initially planned to take their honeymoon in Bali, but postponed their trip after 9/11.  They had hoped to take this trip in 2002, but decided to go skiing in New England instead.  The Bali bombing just confirmed their choice.  This terror attack and the many on tourist centers around the world that have occurred since then have changed the nature of foreign travel for Americans.  My family likes to travel and does so frequently, but since 9/11, we are more vigilant about choosing where and when we go, and how we dress and behave when we are abroad.  We follow one rule above all:  We try not to look like Americans.  It has nothing to do with us as individuals, but it has everything to do with our culture and our status as Americans and how that is perceived by others and how it affects our safety. 
No Child Left Behind Leaves Me Behind:  On January 8, President George W. Bush signed into law the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Legislation.   This set in motion an increased emphasis on standardized testing and education reform that has had a big effect on my life.  Teachers started “teaching to the tests” and there seemed to be more of them than ever, with increasingly higher stakes.  School curricula changed in response to the tests.  Math and reading increased at the expense of social studies and science.  Music, art and foreign language classes became harder to fit into schedules, sometimes being moved to after-school hours.  Gym classes were dropped or greatly reduced in many schools.  Gym class disappeared from my middle school entirely.  As an athlete, this was a big disappointment to me, but I was lucky that my parents could provide lots of sports experiences to me through tennis lessons and through park and recreation sports teams.  Others were not so lucky.  The removal of physical education from schools was probably a big factor in the obesity epidemic in young people today. 
NCLB had another shaping impact on my life.  I suffer from test anxiety.  I go weak at the knees at the sight of #2 lead pencils and bubble sheets, and dread that eerie noisy “silence” of the large testing hall with the clock, the test proctors, and all the sights, sounds and smells that come with those tests.  NCLB was my worst nightmare.  The passage of this legislation 10 years ago did nothing to help me conquer this anxiety; it just made it worse.  Now there were even more standardized tests.  I never did well on these tests.  Of course being nervous didn't help.  It now occurs to me that perhaps the schools were so overwhelmed by all the requirements that they just didn’t do a very good job of preparing us for them anyway.   It's the subject of much debate whether NCLB really has done anything to improve the educational attainment of American students.  The results, as they say, are mixed at best.
To this day, I do what I can to avoid standardized tests, and I have planned my future around avoiding them.  For example, I am shaping my graduate school plans by figuring out programs that do not require the GRE exam.  Ironically, I have pretty much decided to become a school counselor to try to do for other kids with testing issues what no one did for me: help them conquer their testing fears.  If we are going to live in an educational system that is determined to test the living bejeebers out of our kids, I hope to do my best to help kids survive it better than I did.  Who knows?  Maybe our textbook is right in saying that “We as individuals can affect the very social structure that affects us” (Newman, 2010, p. 47).  I can try to change the test-test-test atmosphere, or at least help students learn to cope with it.
A Happier Note On Which To End:  In 2002, Serena Williams beat her sister Venus to win the Wimbledon Tennis Championship, the most prestigious tennis tournament in the world.  The emergence of the Williams sisters, black women who grew up poor in California and who learned to play tennis on run-down public courts, changed the shape of professional tennis forever.  Tennis before the Williams was predominantly a very non-diverse sport played predominantly by rich white people.  The successes of the William sisters (which continue to this day) changed perceptions of the sport for many.  It inspired me to keep playing, despite often being the only minority on my teams, and showed me that achieving a very high level of skill in the game is not a matter of your race or background.  It has everything to do with talent and hard work.  Thank you Venus and Serena!

Work Cited:
Newman, D.M. (2010). Sociology:  Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life.  8th Ed.  Pine Forge Press: Thousand Oaks, California.
A note about other references:
The historical events I mention here are derived from the following lists of important events for 2002:
InfoPlease  list for 2002 is found by clicking here: http://www.infoplease.com/linkagreement.html
Wikipedia also has a very extensive list found by clicking here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002